Group+7

= = =O: Dan, Ashely, Samantha, Michelle, Tyler, Abigail, Kara, Cameron= =B: Rebecca, Faris, Jenny, Julie, Andrew=

Link 3

I think that is kinda dangerous and sort of risky but in this case it worked out and i find it pretty funny. If i was in that situation no i would no post it on Facebook. In conclusion i think that donating organs and such is a good thing, I just think that its kinda weird how this stuff is posted on Facebook. Andrew June 7 7:26

I think this its REALLY great! haha its kinda funny! and really rare... i really think this is great! but i would be worried about it... just because it was on fb... Would you do something like this if you were a perfect match for someone who needs it but is posted on facebook? Ashley McNaughton June 3rd 6:31 pm

I actually think this is pretty amazing and great. With all the wrong we see in the world daily its really nice to see that there's people like Paul out there with a good heart! It really goes to show and makes you think about the people that we know now. Right now, they might just be people who you say hey to in the hallway, but decades from now you never really know what your relationship with them will be. This kind of gives me a whole other way of looking at the use of facebook. Some people just use it as a social networking program, a way to see what people are doing and whats going on in other peoples lives and inform them whats going on its yours. But some people actually use it as a way to raise awareness, and i personally think that's a really great idea. To answer your question Ashley, I would DEFINITELY donate an organ to someone if i was there perfect match and it was necessary, but if it was posted on facebook I dont know if i'd go through all the trouble of contacting them and finding them. When you guys see groups on facebook trying to raise awareness for something do you usually join them, or just skim by them thinking they're gimmicks for money? Kara June 3rd 7:51

Yah this is pretty awesome i might donate when im older and the condition of my organs is stable, but i would kinda be worried about at the end when they say there's people asking for organs on various social networking sites, black market sales perhaps :P Faris June 6 2010 11:41AM

I have to agree with you Ashley and Kara. I think it could or might be dangerous putting stuff like that on Facebook but then again there are people out there that help you if you need it. I do think that you have t be careful of what you find on Facebook because not everything you find is true or it could be half true. To answer Ashley's question Yes I do think I would help someone on Facebook if I was a perfect match but I would DEFIANTLY help then if I knew them or have any kind of connection with the person. Would you post anything like this on Facebook if you needed help? Samantha June.6.2010 1:22pm

I think this could be dangerous putting stuff like this on Facebook but people are monitoring Facebook so they say?! It's kind of hard to pick a side here it can be good and bad at the same time. I think as long as people are using it for a good cause, and not abusing their powers it's OK! To answer Kara's question: It kind of depends on what they are. I don't ever join then but sometimes I will look at them to see what they are saying. Everyone has to be careful of what they say, do, post, and read on Facebook. Samantha June.6.2010 1:35

This is awesome! When something like this happens it proves there is definitely still a lot of good in the world. I think facebook was a really good idea and I would possibly do the same thing because, you can ask for help to people and then create a network for yourself about finding a kidney. Facebook is a huge way to gain awareness, its purpose is to pass and gain information quickly between people everywhere. Do you think that after this, Eli and Paul will become closer and good friends again or, will they go back to having a distant relationship? Jenny, June 6 1:40

I agree, I think this story is truly a miracle for this man. Without the transplant his kids would be fatherless. Thankfully there are people in the world who are kind hearted enough to do things such as this. If I were in Paul’s position, I do not know if I would go through with it. I think it would depend on how much I knew the person. Getting surgery for somebody else is a very big decision. Although sometimes the risks are not very high, you never know what is going to happen to you for sure. I do not think I would post something like this on Facebook if I needed help, because I think I would want to find somebody closer to me to donate, not some stranger I’ve never met before. I think Eli and Paul will remain closer friends because Eli will have something of Paul’s that links them together. Paul has done a huge favor for Eli and I think he will be forever thankful. Do you think you would be able to get a transplant from someone you met through Facebook, or do not know very well? Julie 06/06/10 1:55 PM

I agree fully with what everyone is saying. But I guess there's a risk in everything to do, and clearly through Eli putting this on Facebook he took a good risk. To answer your question Julie, I think it would be extremely difficult to get a transplant from someone I met through Facebook, or don't know very well. Also, i think it would be difficult to give an organ to someone who I met through Facebook, or don't know very well. Although giving an organ, and the surgery to do so doesn't come with many risks, after the surgery the person will have scars and have to be in bed rest for a little while. Going through this process would also cause many emotional and physical stress, so I think if i were to do something like this, it would be with someone who I know fairly well. My question is, if this whole process goes over well, do you think that miracles like this will happen more often? Kara June 6th 3:03

Kara i don't think that this event will cause more then usual to happen, but i do believe they will contunie to happen, or at least hope. The man give the kidney was a once in a life time man, because most of us wouldn't do such a thing, most people are to selfish or just don't care because it's just a friend over facebook and there death won't really effect them if they do nothing. Also it is easier to not care about anyone but your self, which is what most people do, but for the odd ones like this man giving the kidney they make the miracles. I guess you could say maybe more people will be inspired to give to there fellow man or woman by this even if it's just giving some one on the street a toonie. Michelle 06/06/10 5:47 pm

I think this a nice story and a good coincidence, but I think this is more or less a one time occurence. Most situations like these are arranged via the hospital, so I don't think people will resort to Facebook before that. I also agree that there is a certain risk involved, and with Faris' point in particular, that a long distance "friend" might have changed since you saw them last. Still, it's nice to see a happy story in the news for once. Does anyone think that more requests like these will occur, that will turn out to be fake scenarios (Black Market?) Dan June 6th, 6:44 PM

Dan i think a lot more of these request will be posted on facebook, out of deperation to live. I also agree this is a heart warming story but a very out of the ordinary one to say the least. I believe i will cause a lot of fake calls for help, it may even cause a frenzy to see what people are willing to do for you, so a popularity contest you could say. But the point of this article is that this man seriously needed help to live and some one gave that to him so not matter how out of the ordinary that some one answered and over facebook it was it still happened, and made one life longer. Michelle 06/06/10 7:23 pm

If I needed a kidney donation, I would probably use a hospital program for as long as I could before using facebook. If I did use facebook, I would have to have some relation to the person offering to donate, like how Eli and Paul used to be good friends. Paul realized that Eli had a family, he was working all the time and had to go to the hospital 3 times a week for 3 hours to have his blood cleaned. I can’t imagine how much trouble it would be to do that. I think It was a miracle that Paul cared so much to help. Jenny, June 6, 8:20

Oh, well I agree, if you need the donation bad enough, do what you can, but I agree with Jenny, the hospital is the best choice. In a way, the man was very lucky that this guy turned out to be good on his deal. There are many people these days who will scam you out of anything. Still, a very good story on the news for a change. Dan June 6th, 10:13

Soooo who here is going to be an organ donor just to be able to say to people your an organ donor because you like to help people? It would look nice on the resume...i have nothing to say! Faris June 7 2010 4:37PM

I am a provincial Organ Donor...i think its a great idea to be an organ donor...knowing that my usable organs are being put to good use! I mean knowing my organs will be used for the better...that makes me feel much better about dieing...at least I'm helping someone else...who really needs it...I agree with Dan being a very good story in the new for a change :) Ashley McNaughton June 7 2010 9:58 pm

This was a very interesting topic and much more uplifting then the other two. I think that we will be seeing more things like this on facebook however we might also see people doing this sort of thing as a scam to see how much fans or group members they could get. I defiantly wouldn't go to facebook for my health problems for my first resort, however if i needed a kidney or another organ and are having problems getting one, then by all means necessary I'll do what i can to get that kidney. Cameron June 7 10:28pm

Awesome Ashley, just awesome.- Faris

Link 2 - Watch the video (if you are unable, read the article) and make your comments.

I think this is unreal. the parents shouldnt let the kid do it in the first place but to keep him doing that is rediculous, and keep letting the baby doing is unsafe. I got very mad when I saw this video. If you were the mother what would you do? Samantha Meade June.1 10:35am

THIS IS STUPID! What kind of mother lets there 2 year old kid smoke???? i cant believe she "doesn't" know how her kid got started smoking....You really cant be a good mother if you don't know how your 2 YEAR OLD KID!!! started smoking... that just means that she does not watch out for her kid enough!!! and that extreamly mean man who taunts a little kid like that even if it was for some fun...its really mean i mean if you were addicted to something and someone taunted you with that one thing you were addicted to that would be really hard to even try to resist the craving! I agree with Samantha this is quite ridiculous! and really unhealthy for the kid i mean he's already 40 pounds and hes 2!!!! like come on... If i was the mother....what would i do.... i would do everything in my power to prevent this from ever happening...in the first place and i defiantly would not have let my kid smoke that cigarette...even if i knew where it came from...thats just sick! QUESTION! How do you think the kid feels... Ashley McNaughton June 1 6:29 pm

I think that the content of this video is ridiculous. A two year old smoking is completely unacceptable even if in his country most of the population starts smoking at a young age. His parents should understand the long term effects that could possibly kill their son at a young age. Almost 170 nations have agreed to sign a treaty that promotes health warnings and other anti-smoking measures; however Indonesia is the only country in the Asia-Pacific region to disagree to the World Health Organization’s framework on tobacco control. Indonesia is putting all their citizens’ lives at risk. Why do you think the Indonesian government is not signing this treaty for the health of their citizens? The stranger tempted the little boy with his cigarette in the video; this shows that Indonesians do not fully understand the effects cigarettes have, either. To answer your question, this kid is only two years old; he probably does not really know what he is doing to his body. He is not old enough to fully understand the consequences from smoking. Julie 01/06/10 7:09

That video was actually hard to watch, its terrible! A two year old smoking 40 cigarettes a day, imagine what that's doing to the child's lungs! At two years of age, your lungs aren't even fully developed yet. I think that people are jumping to quickly on the fact that its Indonesia's fault for not signing the treaty for health of there citizens. I believe that the whole situation with Aldi, is ultimately his parents fault. The mother claims that they were just in the market and suddenly she turned and he had a cigarette. Well, who lit the cigarette? And who kept providing him with more and more? A two year old can't go buy his own cigarettes, no matter what country your in. To answer your question Julie, it doesn't really make much sense to me that the Indonesian government wont sign the treaty. The only reason I can come up with is that with Indonesia not being fully educated, they might not know what cigarettes can do to you. Or possibly, since so many people there do smoke, maybe the members of the government don't see anything wrong with it and are smokers themselves? But I guess its not really official that they're not signing it, the spokesman for the Ministry of Health, Tritarayati, said: "We're still discussing it." But they better act fast, since the number of children ages 5-9 who use cigarettes has increased 400%! A question I have is how come the mother doesn't just say no and stop giving the child cigarettes? Most parents forbid their kids from doing certain things, and yes it upsets the kid and they might cry. But don't you think the child's life is worth it?Kara June 1st 7:42

NO I DONT THINK THE CHILDS LIFE IS WORTH IT!!! Are you crazy? The kid might die when their like three he has to stop I dont care if he cry's he can cry all he wants. It's like saying my baby girls hits another child at dare care and tje teacher tells me and idont do anything about it. The hitting turns onto puching and spitting and then what the mother is going to do something about it sn then its just going to get into a big fight and not end up well. If I just delt with it at first then none of this would have happened. What would you do if your bby was crying for a smoke? Samantha Meade June.2.2010 12:34pm

OMFG! this is stupid the MOTHER is not adquit enough to look after her child. PERIOD! in canada if this happend the child would be taken to social services and thats what should be done there! HOLY HELL who cares if people start smoking early in age and its even more prodoment in males who cares! That mother should have her child takin a way from her in my oppion! to answer samanthas question i would let my baby cry and in the bloody first place i would not let that happen! like i said in my first post! GOD!! that mother has to have something wrong wiht her head if she contunitly lets her TWO YEAR OLD! child smoke!!!!! THIS MAKES ME ANGRY!!!!!!!!! @: How do you feel about this...? Ashley McNaughton June 2, 2010 4:44 pm

I really like your comparison Samantha, its a good point. If they would have just dealt with it at the beginning the child wouldn't be in the position he's in now and neither would the parents. I understand that smoking at a young age isn't a terrible thing in Indonesia, but you'd think good parents would try and steer there kids away from things like that anyways. I agree that this mother hasn't made the right choices for her son, but I guess we have to understand that they don't all live with the same values we do in Canada. But what I DO NOT understand is why she's choosing to play the role as "such a good mother" by claiming she doesn't want to see her little boy cry, yet she's willing to lay his life on the line? Little weird if you ask me. To answer your question Ashley, obviously we're all angry and confused too..there's no reason to be happy about it? Do you guys think that in the end the mothers actually going to try and help Aldi stop smoking, or just give up and let him smoke and hope nothing happens to him? (which clearly..something will happen to him health wise.) Kara June 2, 6:58

I agree with all these things, even the swearing acronyms, and especially Julie, but you all seem so surprised that they think this is normal, when in their eyes, it is. In Indonesia, there are barely any constraints on smoking, ads are everywhere, everybody does it, nobody see's why not, and if they do, who cares, they're still being normal, if they didn't smoke they'd be the weird ones. As opposed to here, where even on the cases of cigarettes themselves, it tells us not to smoke. On television, in ads, and through word of mouth we are being told not to smoke, so we all now have in mind that smoking is way out of the norm, we have to try to see things in their eyes to see why they think of this as a joke, and entertainment, even though its terrible, do you really think they are taking us one hundred percent seriously? Faris June 2 7:20 This video is disturbing. This child will definitely have major problems as he gets older because like Kara said, his lungs are still developing but, so is the rest of his body and his brain. The kid is two, the mother should take them away, let the him cry about it. He’s probably to young to be able to remember smoking as he gets older. He can’t make decisions for himself. He can barely walk! I also agree with Faris, smoking is obviously a huge problem in Indonesia it also seems to be a huge business, and all the people don't understand how unhealthy it is. To answer if they’re taking us 100% seriously, I doubt it. They don’t want other people telling them what’s wrong and right. Imagine how much money is being made when the smoking age is apparently non-existant. What I don’t understand is, if the mother is so against her child smoking, why let him start in the first place? She clearly started this addiction and she knows it's wrong but then why does she still let it continue? Jenny, June 2, 9:45

Wow, kinda forgot to comment here, but this is the true definition of bad parenting. Any parent who would let their 2 year old child do this without trying to put a stop to it is clearly not well in the head. I have no idea why she lets it continue and she really should try to put an end to it before her child contracts a serious disease because of smoking. Dan, June 3, 6:40

Smoking effects everyone especially babys, yes i agree with Jenny your lungs are still developing as a baby ( age 2 ) and i dont know what this mother was thinking about when she is smoking near even not near her baby. I think the mother is totally lost and doesn't understand whats wrong and whats right. To go along with Faris and Jenny, yes in Indonesia smoking is a huge business and problem but just like everyone else if your making millions probably billions on some product your not going to just stop. Andrew June 3 7:30

Smoking is definatly not something anyone should take up, but for a toddler to take it up thats just unreal. Babies should never even inhale second hand smoke let alone smoke. What parent in the right mind would let there child smoke? especially a baby. 40 cigarettes daily is more then most people smoke with an addiction at a later age. Does anyone think this baby will stop smoking before its to late??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Cameron, June 3, 8:18 AM

Sorry Kara I didn't mean to offened you but it's trun like when you think about it its's not safe or right to keep you baby smoking! I was just rereading the notes and i think i came out alittle too mean and I'm Sorry! :) ~Samantha Meade~ June.3 12:23pm

I watched this video in shock. I mean i understand when your addicted your addicted but usually people that are addicted are at least our age, but when it is a child who is two, well thats just a little rediculas. the parents have no control and he is only two, the child needs to be put into rehab, and never be aloud a smoke again. the damage on his body that has happened would be very bad because he is devolping the most at his age now, i personally think his parents should be in jail, and the boy in foster care or rehab at least somewhere that cares about his health. Does anyone agree ? Michelle june 3rd 6:50 pm

I that if this were in Canada, his parents may be in jail, but perhaps they should start to enforce it in Indonesia Yeah so anyway, um don't smoke? Hmm convorsation starter....ummmm, this is really bad...uhhh oh i know, with a baby smoking in Indonesia, does anybody think this would ever happen in canada? Faris June 3rd 8:44 pm

I think a major thing I constantly think about while reading everyone’s comments is that this child is only two. He doesn’t even look it in the video. I find that just keeps shocking me every time! If this were happening in Canada, the parents would probably be in jail, social services would be called and that child would probably spend the next few months or year in a hospital. His chances for cancer are definitely high. I think people need to remember that, yes this is a 2 year old smoking but, this happens all the time in Canada. Second hand smoke has been proven to be just as bad as first hand smoking. This video should really open every adults eyes when they realize, what’s happing in Indonesia is just a dramatic affect that is really happening all around the world. It’s just so uncommon to see a 2 year old smoking compared to the second hand intake we see everyday in our society. Jenny, June 3, 11:06pm

=Link 1=

type response followed by your name and date

I believe Clinton should have looked more into who did it before she automatically tried to think of what to do with the accused, I'd she experienced enough with these Korean affairs to take part? Faris May 26 11:28 am

I also believe that Clinton did not look into who let alone how the ship sunk. She did not know much about the situation to accuse anyone of this "crime". I personally do not think she is "experienced" enough to deal with this.. its not the fact that she is not experienced it the fact that she does not know how to deal with it. What would you do if you were in Clinton's position? Ashley May 28 6:14 pm

Yes I also agree with my fellow students that she defiantly didn't look into this well enough. She didn't study enough to wright on it. But then again I do think that it's upsetting that 46 South Korean sailors died. If I was in Clinton's position i would probably back off and not bother it it or get a little more information, maybe get into it more. wright more about it. what do you think about all the soldiers dieing? Samantha Meade May.28.2010 6:20pm

The 46 sailors that died it just pain sad! To be honest I think Clinton is a complete idiot to but into this type of crises!! How do you feel about Clinton, do you think that she should be involved in anyway? Ashley May 28 6:33 pm

I think that Hillary Clinton has a right to be involved and concerned about the sinking of South Korea's ship, but I also believe that she’s jumping to the conclusion that North Korea is to blame. North and South Korea have had issues in the past, and I believe Clinton is attempting to take this matter into her own hands. Although in some cases this may be a good thing, I think Clinton needs to let North Korea present evidence behind their side along with viewing the presented evidence. Also, i think by her making assumptions that it was North Korea's doing might cause tension between North Korea and the USA. I think looking back on history, the Civil War in 1950 didn’t help the ongoing battle between North and South Korea. Do you think that this event could cause another civil war, and if yes do you actually think it would be beneficial? Kara May 28th 7:30 pm

North and South Korea have had issues in the past and I think these issues are still not entirely resolved. I agree that further evidence needs to be shown before any major decisions are made. North Korea threatens that any attempt to punish them, could lead to war. Based on their violent history, I think Hilary Clinton needs to slow down and really think about what results her decisions will cause. Personally, I think war is never the answer, therefore, if there were another war I do not think it would be beneficial. I think that Hilary Clinton’s decisions will decide whether there will be another war or not. I do not understand why she is the only one from the USA government speaking publicly. Where do you think Barack Obama is in all these important decisions Hilary Clinton is making on her own, that could change the relationship between certain countries? Julie 30/05/10 1:08 PM

I somewhat agree with many of you, Clinton may not be experienced enough in this field to work with this but she is still allowed to, she is still part of any political affairs and has the right to be trying to fix anything she wants. We may be being ignorant to say negative things about how she is handling this because they're a lot of aspects that we are not seeing, after all, we're just students, she was almost president of the united states, who would know what's she's doing if she got that far, in most cases. Faris May 30 2010 2:22 PM

I agree with many of you toward Clinton and how she is handling this situation without much information towards the sinking of the South Koreans ship. I feel that not enough information is being given to the public because to me, it looks like people are just blaming and teaming up on each other. And unless more information is given out, I can't tell if Clinton's making the proper choice to become involved. The situation should be solved carefully because threats to start a war should not be taken lightly. Jenny, May 30, 3:10

I agree with Julies point about Hilary Clinton's decision being the major factor that decides whether there will be a war or not. I feel like the USA's involvement is coming directly from Clinton, and agree that its a little strange the United States president, Barack Obama hasn't shown a voice in this. I believe it should ultimately be him who decides the USA's involvement in this event. I think that none of the information being given is fully clear, and before anyone starts pointing fingers, there needs to be more information presented. Since the United States is getting involved, do you guys think Canada should be too? Kara May 30 4:10

I agree with Kara, Barack Obama was voted president of the USA for a reason, he should be stepping up during times such as these and making a well thought out decision for his country. I also agree with Jenny, that more information needs to be given to the public. Right now, Hilary Clinton is telling the USA that North America is completely to blame without giving proof of evidence or other details. Without these details, USA automatically believes what they hear before knowing the complete truth. I disagree that just because Hilary Clinton was almost voted president the way she is handling things is right. I believe that people have their positive and negative traits. Just because Hilary Clinton was almost voted president, that does not mean she is always right. People rush into things before realizing what they are really doing. Canada has always been known as the peace keeping country and I think we should keep it that way. Canada getting involved is just asking for a bigger war then threatened in the beginning. I think we should just stay out of it and let the other countries make their own mistakes by themselves. Do you think the USA is agreeing with the decisions Hilary Clinton is making? Or do you think they just want to let North and South Korea figure their issues out for themselves? Julie 30/05/10 6:41 PM

I really don't think the USA is going to help out because they realize think it's more or less just Hilary Clinton just wanting to get in the news again, and is a publicity stunt to try to gain more respect of the American people. I think President Obama and the rest of the higher US government realize that it is something to be dealt with internally (between North Korea and South Korea, and that they really have no business being in it. So I think that this situation will end up dying down, and the matter will be resolved between the two parties involved, without the "help" of the United States, or even Canada for that matter. Does anyone think that the South Koreans actually want the Americans involved? Dan, May 30th, 8:07 PM

I think that Clinton should have looked into the project a little bit more then she did. I also think that all the soldiers dieing is sad, but it is their job to protect and if they die they die. That's what the military is all about. Yes I do think that they want the Americans involved.they said they, "We're very confident in the South Korean leadership, and their decision about how and when to move forward is one that we respect and will support," If you were Clinton what have you done different? Samantha Meade 05/30/10 9:00pm

Honestly, if I were Clinton, I would have just shut up and let them deal with it. She has no relation at all to what North and South Korea do to each other, even if she's trying to keep the peace. Both are powerful countries and with a war in Iraq already occuring, the last thing the US needs is to have another country go against them. If both countries were to go to war and the US wanted to help South Korea in some way, then great, but her comments are stirring the pot rather than helping out. The world isn't always an American issue, and Clinton is acting as more of an instigator rather than a peacekeeper. Do you think this displeased North Korea and do you think they would potentially take action against the United States? Dan, May 30th, 9:43 PM

I do agree with the fact that this is a major issue, but I do believe that it is a major issue between North Korea and South Korea and that Clinton should stay out of it. I think that the US got involved with the situation way to early and there involvement in this dilemma could make it even worse and could start war, and we all know Americans are very familiar with war. If war were to break out the Americans would be dragged into it and not only would they be fighting in that war but they would be fighting in the Iraq war as well. I agree with The Stridster that this was a selfish move by Clinton by getting involved in this, Clinton just did it as a publicity stunt and this selfish stunt could make matters worse for the whole situation. Honestly do you think that the involvement of the US is going to help fix the problem? Cameron May 30th, 10:13 PM

I agree with Julie and I hope that if Clinton continues to invole the U.S, she has a good plan before going any further. I think this is a problem between North Korea and South Korea and that other countries should keep an eye on what’s happening but, to not get involved unless necessary. Jenny, May 30, 10:1 9

I think it is completely unnecessary for other countries to get involved unless it gets really bad. The US joined to soon. Sure it is a major issue and I do agree that there should be some involvement but I don't think there should be any just yet. Does the United States really need another war on their hands? CAMERON May 30th, 10:38 PM

I believe that other country's have a right to step in. Due to the fact that the oil will at some point be washed up on every shore all over the world. Therefore every country and person should be involved with this issue. I also believe that the people responsible should be punished. The people at fault will be taking not only a lot of human lives but a lot of our creatures in and out of the water. Something needs to be done and it is absolutely outrageous that with all of our scientist and engineers that we have yet to find a solution, does any one else agree?Michelle, May31st,6:17

I would like to say i agree with most of these statements, i like how kara said Hillary Clinton is involved but she is trying to hide that by jumping to the conclusion it makes her look suspicious. I find Clinton is handling this problem by hiding things and not giving us or anyone much detail which makes this whole event look like it was them who caused it. Andrew May 31 8:38

Dan posted that there is many problems between South and North Korea and i agree with that but he also said Clinton should stay out of these problems because there not his business. I think that South or North Korea did something negatively towards the americans than yes Clinton this would start to become your business but i do believe the cause of the ship sinking had to do with Clinton. Andrew May 31 8:38